Robotics Education & Competition Foundation
Inspirando estudiantes, un robot a la vez.

This Q&A is now read-only

The Official Q and A is now closed. If you want to submit a question for the Worlds Drivers Meeting, please click here. The deadline for question submission is Friday, March 24.

Official Q&A: VRC 2022-2023: Spin Up

Usage Guidelines All Questions

Colored Pneumatic Tubing, Rule R7


12A
1-Jun-2022

Hello members of the Game Design Committee,

I am emailing to inquire about the rationale behind some of the robot rules, particularly R7i. This affected not only my team, but numerous other teams as I talked with them during the World Championship. This also remains my question going forward for this season.

In particular, I want to know why the emphasis on black pneumatic tubing. The rule states identical product numbers to pneumatics parts listed on the VEX website. The part for tubing, TUO425B-X81US1696, when input on the supplier SMC’s website, shows the product as obsolete, and suggests alternative products, such as TUO425B-100, which is the same product just a different length of tubing, maintaining the same OD and ID.

Inspecting the data sheet for the item, it appears that different color codes can be used, and that being the only difference between the items, for example TUO425B being Black tubing, and TUO425BU2 being solid blue. To my knowledge there doesn’t seem to be any functional difference between the products with different colors, and the only discrepancy is in the color code. I want to understand what is the rationale for only requiring black pneumatic tubing, when it wasn’t emphasized before, and why colored tubing was only allowed in the VEX U division.

Additionally, there were teams at Worlds. using pneumatic cylinder fittings that were at 90 degree angles to accommodate tight fitting angles for tubing. The product numbers of these fittings are KQ2L04-M5A. This differs from what is listed, but was not called at worlds. It also doesn’t appear to provide any advantage to teams besides being helping students work with pneumatics in more confined spaces.

The costs for these particular parts aren’t excessive, so I would like to know if parts like these could be considered legal for the future.

Thank you.

Answered by committee

I am emailing to inquire about the rationale behind some of the robot rules, particularly R7i.

We want to remind everyone that per the Q&A Usage Guidelines, "The Q&A system is for rules clarifications only". For general feedback regarding specific events, suggestions, or concerns outside of a specifically unclear rule, please contact [email protected].

Put more pointedly - the Q&A platform is intended to be a communication channel for questions such as "is this interpretation of a rule legal", not a discussion forum for questions such as "I disagree with this rule, can it be explained / changed".

With that being said, the only specific rules question in the post appears to be the following:

I would like to know if parts like these could be considered legal for the future.

Yes, we are always reviewing / considering new iterations of the rules regarding parts legality. Any updates will be documented in a future Game Manual update.