<R7f> states that “an unlimited amount of string no thicker than ¼ inch [is legal to use]” this statement creates some uncertainty on the exact spectrum of legal “string” materials, varying with each team's definition of string. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines string as “a cord, usually used to bind fasten or tie”, within this definition there are two possible interpretations of the definition of string, by use and and by equivalency with cord. Cord is defined by Merium-Webster as “a long slender flexible material usually woven or twisted together”. Which of these two interpretations is correct?
If the GDC defines a string via its use, what situation defines a VRC legal string? is any material used to fasten two items together considered string (providing it meets the diameter restrictions? Does this preclude use of string for tensioning a mechanism, or to use as a stop?
Alternatively if the GDC defines string as “a long slender flexible material” for what range of flexibility constitutes a legal string material. Of course ideally the GDC could make an exact ruling by providing a numerical threshold or analytical process to determine the legality of a material, however this is both a difficult and unreasonable ask. Instead can the GDC provide specific rulings on the following list of materials varying in stiffness, allowing teams to infer whether a material is legal (assuming all materials are within legal diameter). From least stiff to most stiff:
a) Fishing line
b) Paracord
c) Shoelace
d) A strip of cloth
e) Non-VEX pneumatic tubing (used outside of the pneumatic system)
f) Linked chain
g) PLA 3D printing filament
h) Woven steel cable
i) Copper wire
j) Steel wire
k) Thin metal plating
l) Hot glue rod
m) Wooden dowel
Thank you for your time, 334V