I am head referee at an upcoming event and have a question about the 2.4 change in the match replay rule wording.
<G20> Match replays are allowed, but rare. Match replays, i.e. playing a Match over again from its start, are at the discretion of the Event Partner and Head Referee, and will only be issued in the most extreme circumstances. Some example situations that may warrant a Match replay are as follows: ... b. A V5 Robot Brain lockup that is outside of the Team’s control and results in a complete shutdown of the Robot. To qualify for a Match replay, all of the following criteria (shown below) must be met:
This new wording is contradictory. The words in the header of the rule are "at the discretion", "Some example situations", and "may warrant a Match replay" while subpart b uses the language "must be met."
So which is it, do I have the discretion to choose when the match will be replayed on a white screen taking into consideration the criteria i-iv listed under subpart b (as when I decide if a field issue is match affecting and should be replayed) or does the "must" wording in subpart b override the header text?