At a recent competition I had a team who had an alternate setup for autonomous. It was a subsystem 3 that was an extension that touched the inside of the wall so they did not need to program a turn like in the image below. They tried demonstrating this in inspection and were told by Head Judge and a on site Rec Foundation employee this was not a legal size. If measured as separate setups both were within size restrictions meeting SG1 and SG2. Based on the part they removed and added the robot needed to be put in different orientations to fit though, one direction for driving and one for autonomous like the <SG1>picture. Is there a requirement that when a subsystem 3 is changed it needs to be oriented in the same direction and meet size requirements, or is it ok to be oriented differently to meet size restrictions?