In the answer to Q&A 2026, it was stated that
a Robot that is lifting, raising, or otherwise interacting with another Robot that is in Possession of one or more Scoring Objects is not considered to be in Possession of that Robot's Scoring Objects
However, this only covers scenarios where a robot is interacting with another robot and does not explicitly cover the case where a robot directly interacts with another robot's scoring objects.
In a hypothetical scenario, Robot A has mobile goal 1 being possessed in their back clamp while Robot B is also possessing mobile goal 2 in a similar manner. Robot A deploys a mechanism that directly grabs onto the rim of mobile goal 2, and Robot A uses this to pull mobile goal 2 (and Robot B along with it, as it is still clamped to mobile goal 2).
1a: Should there be a pinning count called here, as Robot B is being pulled by Robot A despite their ability to drop mobile goal 2 at any moment? 1b: Is Robot A double possessing, as they are directly pulling mobile goal 2 (which is also in possession by Robot B) while in possession of mobile goal 1? 1c: If Robot B releases mobile goal 2 and Robot A continues to drag mobile goal 2 for a short distance before the driver reacts and releases mobile goal 2, would this be a major, minor, or no violation of <SG6>? Robot B may have forced Robot A into a penalty because the driver of Robot A could not have reacted instantaneously, but Robot A also assumes this risk of double possession when they use this strategy.
Finally, if the answer to 1b is yes, what about an analogous version of Scenario B from Q&A 2520? That is, instead of grabbing onto the rim of mobile goal 2, Robot A uses a 2-bar mechanism to score a ring onto mobile goal 2 while it is in possession of robot B.